Sooner Be RED

hmmmm .. who could it be .. from OK .. is a jackass .. a know it all .. a skank .. is frigid .. fat .. hog ugly .. ?

Thank God THAT is not going to by running MY Country

Today's DNC decision although still pandered to Hillary drove the tenth stake into that dark heart.  Is it me or is that Harold Ickes just plain icky?  What a cynical lying scumbug.  Hey....maybe sooner be blue the dope is Mrs. Ickes !!!!

A BUNCH OF UNDER EDUCATED WHITE TRASH SEXIST BIAST POST MENOPAUSE SHREWS

.......AND THAT'S ON A GOOD DAY

Gee .. kind of like Hillary herself.  The butt grows bigger every day.  Hey butt sniffer....what's with the lying?  You promised to drag your fat ass outta here and you're back?  What's the matter, Hillary too busy to let you kiss her fat ass?

Any and jackasses doing so are even lamer.  You know who you are.  Loser.

 A swarm of biographers in miners' gear has tried to plumb the inky depths of 

Hillary Rodham Clinton's warren-riddled psyche. My metaphor is drawn (as Oscar 

Wilde's prim Miss Prism would say) from the Scranton coalfields, to which came 

the Welsh family that produced Hillary's harsh, domineering father.  Hillary's feckless, loutish brothers (who are kept at arm's length by her operation) 

took the brunt of Hugh Rodham's abuse in their genteel but claustrophobic home. Hillary 

is the barracuda who fought for dominance at their expense. Flashes of that ruthless 

old family drama have come out repeatedly in this campaign, as when Hillary could 

barely conceal her sneers at her fellow debaters onstage -- the wimpy, cringing 

brothers at the dinner table.  Hillary's willingness to tolerate Bill's compulsive philandering is a function of 

her general contempt for men. She distrusts them and feels morally superior to them. 

Following the pattern of her long-suffering mother, she thinks it is her mission to 

endure every insult and personal degradation for a higher cause -- which, unlike 

her self-sacrificing mother, she identifies with her near-messianic personal ambition.  It's no coincidence that Hillary's staff has always consisted mostly of adoring 

women, with nerdy or geeky guys forming an adjunct brain trust. Hillary's rumored 

hostility to uniformed military men and some Secret Service agents early in the 

first Clinton presidency probably belongs to this pattern. And let's not forget 

Hillary, the governor's wife, pulling out a book and rudely reading in the 

bleachers during University of Arkansas 

football games back in Little Rock.  Hillary's disdain for masculinity fits right into the classic feminazi package,

 which is why Hillary acts on Gloria Steinem like catnip. Steinem's fawning, gaseous

 New York Times op-ed about her pal Hillary this week speaks volumes about the snobby

 clubbiness and reactionary sentimentality of the fossilized feminist establishment,

 which has blessedly fallen off the cultural map in the 21st century. History will

 judge Steinem and company very severely for their ethically obtuse indifference

 to the stream of working-class women and female subordinates whom Bill Clinton 

sexually harassed and abused, enabled by look-the-other-way and trash-the-victims 

Hillary.  How does all this affect the prospect of a Hillary presidency? With her eyes 

on the White House, Hillary as senator has made concerted and generally successful 

efforts to improve her knowledge of and relationship to the military -- crucial 

for any commander-in-chief but especially for the first female one. However, 

I remain concerned about her future conduct of high-level diplomacy. Contemptuous 

condescension seems to be Hillary's default mode with any male who criticizes her 

or stands in her way. It's a Nixonian reflex steeped in toxic gender bias. How will 

that play in the Muslim world?  The Clintons live to campaign. It's what holds them together and gives them a 

glowing sense of meaning and value. Their actual political accomplishments are 

fairly slight. The obsessive need to keep campaigning may mean a president Hillary 

would go right on spewing the bitterly partisan rhetoric that has already paralyzed 

Washington. Even if Hillary could be elected (which I'm skeptical about), how in 

tarnation could she ever govern?  The current wave of support for Barack Obama from Democrats, independents, and even 

some Republicans is partly based on his vision of a new political discourse that 

breaks with the petty, destructive polarization of the past 20 years. Whether 

Obama can build up his foreign policy credentials sufficiently to reassure an 

anxious general electorate remains to be seen.  But Hillary herself, with her thin, spotty record, tangled psychological baggage, 

and maundering blowhard of a husband, is also a mighty big roll of the dice. She

is a brittle, relentless manipulator with few stable core values who shuffles 

through useful personalities like a card shark ("Cue the tears!"). Forget all 

her little gold crosses: Hillary's real god is political expediency. Do Americans 

truly want this hard-bitten Machiavellian back in the White House? Day one will 

just be more of the same. 

CLICK HERE